by Lee Williams
It’s not just Patrick “Tate” Adamiak or his friends and family, or a reporter, who believe Joe Biden’s ATF was far too harsh in their treatment of the young active-duty sailor, who is starting the fourth year of his 20-year federal prison sentence even though he broke no law and did nothing wrong.
ATF Director Robert Cekada, who was handpicked by President Donald J. Trump, does not believe Adamiak was treated fairly by either Biden’s ATF or the Justice Department.
Instead, Cekada believes Adamiak was massively over-sentenced.
“On the facts of this case, the sentence Mr. Adamiak received is excessive. Mr. Adamiak had no prior criminal history. He dealt with these weapons as curios. We have no evidence that he intended to use the weapons unlawfully or that he was part of a criminal organization. The extremely high sentencing guidelines likely reflect the paradigmatic cases of individuals possessing destructive devices, such as grenade launchers, and normally involve terrorism or organized criminal activity. No such conduct was present here. For me, unlawful possession of National Firearms Act items sentences approximately in the three-to-five-year range are common,” he told me last week.
He could not be more correct. His own agency proves it every single week.
Cekada’s ATF regularly updates the public about its ongoing investigations. Every Friday, ATF officials publicize who’s been arrested by their agents and who’s been convicted, as well as the length of the criminal sentences the bad guys receive.
Even a modest look at these press releases reveals how badly Adamiak was treated. They show criminals—real criminals—who received far less time behind bars than the 240 months Adamiak is currently serving.
Here are some examples that were released last Friday:
Takeaways
Lighting a sleeping man on fire, illegally selling meth while armed, illegally selling meth to gang members, illegally possessing and selling machineguns, illegally selling stolen firearms, and shooting at a fleeing Uber driver are all real crimes, not the made-up junk Adamiak faced. But Adamiak was sentenced to far more time behind bars than any of these real criminals, most of whom had previous felony convictions.
As Cekada said, “the sentence Mr. Adamiak received is excessive.”
It certainly is, but I tend to describe it with words that are not fit to print.
One thing is certain, the judge who sentenced Adamiak to two decades behind bars doesn’t want to hear anything about the case or her decision.
Last week, Senior United States District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen cancelled Adamiak’s resentencing hearing. She also barred his attorneys from addressing any issues they have with his sentence, the ATF investigation or the case itself.
Adamiak was not available for comment. He has been moved so frequently lately we’re not even sure where he is at.
We will let you know as soon as this changes, and what he will face next.
The post More proof Adamiak’s 20-year sentence was far beyond the norm appeared first on Second Amendment Foundation.
